Decision and risk memory for delivery teams

Recover the why.Reduce delivery risk.

Cited records before confident decisions.

Verachi connects read-only to the tools your team already uses, then turns scattered context from Slack, GitHub, Microsoft Teams and Jira into decisions, risks, owners, and source links your team can inspect.

Read-only connectors by default Citations on every answer Audit trail for syncs and write-backs
Scroll to learn more
The Problem

Work keeps moving.
Context keeps leaking.

The team is capable, fast, and already using the right tools. The failure mode is simpler: the reasons behind product and technical decisions never become a shared record. Model the assumptions before you trust the number.

Team Profile

Adjust your assumptions

6
12
$200K
Without Verachi

The cost of context leaks

Hours lost / year 3,744 hrs
Hidden cost / year $360K

Time and money burned on "decision archaeology"—searching Slack, re-reading old tickets, and asking the same questions again.

With Verachi

The ROI of shared context

Hours reclaimed 2,246 hrs
Annual savings $216K

Time and budget returned to building. This model assumes Verachi helps recover 60% of context-reconstruction time; your pilot should prove or revise that rate.

Default model: 6 people, $200K fully-loaded annual cost, 12 context-reconstruction hours per person per week, and a 60% recovery target. Treat it as a planning model, not a guaranteed outcome.

Before Verachi

Same channels. No shared memory.

Important calls happen in Slack, but the final decision, risk owner, and source evidence stay scattered across threads.

#launch-readiness 38 unread · decision unclear
Maya Chen
Maya ChenProduct Lead9:42 AM

Are we still holding checkout behind the fraud-review flag for the pilot?

Alex Rivera
Alex RiveraEngineering Manager9:47 AM

I remember a thread in #payments-risk, but the Jira ticket says the opposite.

Priya Shah
Priya ShahSecurity Lead10:03 AM

The blocker is fraud review coverage. I need the exact decision before approving the launch note.

With Verachi

Same channels. Decisions and risks attached.

Verachi watches the same workspace, captures the decision, links the risk, and posts a cited answer back where the team is already working.

#launch-readiness Verachi context attached
V
Decision found DEC-104 · checkout flag remains on for pilot cohorts

Rationale: fraud-review coverage is not complete for high-risk payment methods. Related risk is still open and assigned to Security.

Risk: at risk Owner: Priya Sources: Slack, Jira, PR
Jordan Lee
Jordan LeeQA Lead10:06 AM

That gives QA the launch rule. I’ll update the pilot checklist against DEC-104.

Decision thread
Ticket context
PR risk signal
Team ask
Slack
Jira
GitHub
Teams
Connect Now

Two minutes to connect.
Zero tools to replace.

Verachi reads from your existing tools with read-only connections. No migration, no new process, no ramp-up time. Your team keeps working where they already work.

Average setup time: 2 minutes per tool
Slack Capture decisions from channels & threads
Jira Link decisions to epics & tickets
GitHub Flag decision drift in PRs
Microsoft Teams Surface context in team channels
4 tools connected · read-only · no migration required
Decisions & Risks

The why, the risk, and the next owner.

Verachi turns scattered Slack threads, tickets, and pull requests into cited delivery records your team can act on.

Decisions

Capture the resolution and rationale

Record what was decided, why it was chosen, who reviewed it, and which source artifacts prove it.

Risks

Track open risk with lifecycle notes

Keep severity, owner, state, mitigation notes, and false-positive closures visible before launch.

Dependencies

See what one decision blocks

Link related decisions, projects, and source artifacts so review work stops depending on memory.

Grounded chat

Ask with citations, not vibes

Answers come back with source references, confidence signals, and the operational record behind them.

Proof Before Purchase

Show me the record, not the promise.

Before a rollout, Verachi should be able to show your team exactly what it captured, which sources support it, and what it can or cannot write back to your systems.

Example decision record

DEC-104 · Checkout flag remains on for pilot cohorts

Inspectable
Rationale
Fraud-review coverage is incomplete for high-risk payment methods.
Owner
Priya Shah · Security Lead
Linked risk
RISK-211 · Retry queue can delay pilot checkout
Slack#launch-readiness thread · 10:03 AM JiraPAY-438 acceptance note GitHubPR #812 review comment
Connector scopes

Read-only first

Slack, Jira, GitHub, and Teams connections start with read access. Optional write-backs are configured explicitly and logged.

Auditability

No hidden actions

Every sync, generated summary, and external write-back is visible in the workspace audit history.

Security review

Answer the blocker early

The pilot includes a connector-scope review, data-boundary walkthrough, and success criteria before production use.

Pricing

Published plans.
Guided rollout.

Start small, scale as you grow. Every plan includes cited decision records, risk workflows, and user-visible audit history. Access starts with a short pilot so connector scopes and success criteria are agreed first.

Starter

For small teams that want durable recall with a scoped pilot and light AI usage.

$5 / month
  • Up to 5 users in one organization
  • 100K monthly AI token budget
  • Decision capture, search, and comments
  • Risk records with owner and severity
  • Chat with 20-message context depth
  • 5 GB workspace storage
Request Starter Pilot
Enterprise

For tenants that need frontier Gemini preview access, governance review, and custom rollout controls.

Custom tailored to your organization
  • Everything in Pro
  • Custom monthly token budget
  • Frontier Gemini preview model access
  • 500K-character transcript processing
  • 100-message chat history depth
  • Security and governance review
  • Custom deployment and success plan
Talk Security & Enterprise

No self-serve account is created from this page yet. The first step is a pilot request so your admin can approve data boundaries before Verachi reads workspace context.

Book a Demo

Give your team one place to recover the why.

See Verachi on your own data boundaries first. We’ll review connector scopes, show the record shape, and agree how the pilot proves or rejects the ROI model.

  • A sample decision record with source citations.
  • A 2-4 week pilot plan with measurable success criteria.
  • Security, governance, and read-only connector review.
  • A practical ROI model based on your team shape.

The default ROI model uses a 6-person team, $200K fully-loaded annual cost, 12 context hours per person per week, and a 60% recovery target. Your pilot should replace those assumptions with evidence.

Requesting General pilot

Optional context